2002 Holden UTE vs. 1997 Suzuki Sidekick
To start off, 2002 Holden UTE is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Suzuki Sidekick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Suzuki Sidekick would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick.
Because 2002 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki Sidekick, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden UTE (306 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick. (133 Nm). This means 2002 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden UTE | 1997 Suzuki Sidekick | |
| Make | Holden | Suzuki |
| Model | UTE | Sidekick |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 306 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2210 mm |
