2002 Holden UTE vs. 2000 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2002 Holden UTE is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 639 more horse power than 2002 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden UTE weights approximately 420 kg more than 2000 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 684 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden UTE. (306 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden UTE | 2000 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Holden | Lotec |
Model | UTE | C 1000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 306 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1150 mm |