2002 Holden UTE vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2002 Holden UTE is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 405 kg more than 2002 Holden UTE.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden UTE (306 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden UTE | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | UTE | SSU |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 306 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2570 mm |
