2002 Holden UTE vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2002 Holden UTE is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Profile would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (206 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2002 Holden UTE. (204 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile weights approximately 60 kg more than 2002 Holden UTE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden UTE. (306 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden UTE | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
| Make | Holden | Oldsmobile |
| Model | UTE | Profile |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 206 HP |
| Torque | 306 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2880 mm |
