2002 Holden UTE vs. 2000 Volkswagen Hac
To start off, 2002 Holden UTE is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Hac would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. (149 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden UTE weights approximately 169 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Hac, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volkswagen Hac (310 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden UTE. (306 Nm). This means 2000 Volkswagen Hac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden UTE | 2000 Volkswagen Hac | |
Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
Model | UTE | Hac |
Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1896 cc |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 306 Nm | 310 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1331 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2520 mm |