2002 Holden UTE vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2002 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 844 kg more than 2002 Holden UTE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden UTE. (306 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden UTE | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | UTE | Armada |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 306 Nm | 522 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 2344 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3140 mm |