2002 Holden UTE vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (127 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu KB weights approximately 400 kg more than 2002 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden UTE (306 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Holden UTE | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Holden | Isuzu |
| Model | UTE | KB |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2405 cc |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 306 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3060 mm |
