2002 Holden UTE vs. 2008 Renault Megane
To start off, 2008 Renault Megane is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden UTE weights approximately 325 kg more than 2008 Renault Megane.
Because 2002 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden UTE (306 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Megane. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2002 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden UTE | 2008 Renault Megane | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | UTE | Megane |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 306 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2590 mm |