2002 Holden UTE vs. 2012 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2012 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2012 Nissan X-Trail. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 816 kg more than 2002 Holden UTE.

Because 2012 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden UTE (306 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan X-Trail. (226 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan X-Trail.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Holden UTE 2012 Nissan X-Trail
Make Holden Nissan
Model UTE X-Trail
Year Released 2002 2012
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 2488 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 204 HP 169 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 306 Nm 226 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1500 kg 2316 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 4640 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2640 mm