2002 Holden UTE vs. 2012 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2012 Subaru Outback is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2012 Subaru Outback. (170 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2012 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Outback weights approximately 36 kg more than 2002 Holden UTE.
Because 2012 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden UTE (306 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Subaru Outback. (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden UTE | 2012 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Holden | Subaru |
Model | UTE | Outback |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 306 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1536 kg |