2002 Holden Zafira vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2002 Holden Zafira is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 397 more horse power than 2002 Holden Zafira. (145 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Zafira.
Because 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Holden Zafira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 439 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Zafira. (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Zafira.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden Zafira | 1993 Jaguar XJ220 | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | Zafira | XJ220 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1993 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 542 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 642 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 340 mm |