2002 Holden Zafira vs. 1999 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2002 Holden Zafira is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan Cima weights approximately 70 kg more than 2002 Holden Zafira.
Because 1999 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Holden Zafira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden Zafira | 1999 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Zafira | Cima |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |