2002 Honda Accord vs. 1953 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2002 Honda Accord is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Accord (152 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1953 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 1953 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Talbot Baby weights approximately 816 kg more than 2002 Honda Accord.
Because 1953 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Honda Accord | 1953 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Honda | Talbot |
Model | Accord | Baby |
Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3130 mm |