2002 Honda Accord vs. 1964 Zastava 1500

To start off, 2002 Honda Accord is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 2,997 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Honda Accord is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Accord (240 HP) has 187 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda Accord weights approximately 446 kg more than 1964 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda Accord (289 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Zastava 1500.

Compare all specifications: