2002 Honda Accord vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 2002 Honda Accord is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2002 Honda Accord. (166 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Accord.
Because 1984 Lotus Etna is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lotus Etna. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Accord. (264 Nm). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Accord. 2002 Honda Accord has automatic transmission and 1984 Lotus Etna has manual transmission. 1984 Lotus Etna will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Honda Accord will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Honda Accord | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
| Make | Honda | Lotus |
| Model | Accord | Etna |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 166 HP | 331 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 264 Nm | 408 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 95.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.1 mm | 69.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 11.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2520 mm |
