2002 Honda Accord vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2002 Honda Accord is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,354 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Honda Accord is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2002 Honda Accord. (161 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Accord.
Because 2002 Honda Accord is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Accord will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda Accord (216 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2002 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Honda Accord | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Honda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Accord | FTO |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2354 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1300 mm |
