2002 Honda Accord vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Honda Accord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Honda Accord would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2002 Honda Accord. (160 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Accord.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda Accord (218 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Honda Accord | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Honda | Ford |
Model | Accord | E-350 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2354 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 57 L |