2002 Honda Accord vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Honda Accord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Honda Accord would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (199 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2002 Honda Accord. (160 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Accord. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 23 kg more than 2002 Honda Accord. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (258 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Accord. (218 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Accord.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Honda Accord 2013 Cadillac ATS
Make Honda Cadillac
Model Accord ATS
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2353 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 160 HP 199 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6300 RPM
Torque 218 Nm 258 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87 mm 88 mm
Engine Stroke Size 99 mm 101 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.7:1 11.4
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1480 kg 1503 kg
Vehicle Length 4820 mm 4643 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1806 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1418 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2776 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 61 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]