2002 Honda Acty vs. 1964 Reliant Scimitar
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Reliant Scimitar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Acty (127 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1964 Reliant Scimitar. (120 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty should accelerate faster than 1964 Reliant Scimitar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Reliant Scimitar weights approximately 163 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty.
Because 1964 Reliant Scimitar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Reliant Scimitar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Reliant Scimitar (190 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 1964 Reliant Scimitar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Honda Acty | 1964 Reliant Scimitar | |
Make | Honda | Reliant |
Model | Acty | Scimitar |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 190 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1003 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2340 mm |