2002 Honda Acty vs. 1970 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Acty (127 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1970 Mercury Comet. (81 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty should accelerate faster than 1970 Mercury Comet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Mercury Comet weights approximately 380 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty.
Because 1970 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercury Comet (176 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 1970 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Honda Acty | 1970 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Honda | Mercury |
Model | Acty | Comet |
Year Released | 2002 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 2782 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1220 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2630 mm |