2002 Honda Acty vs. 1972 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1972 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Acty (127 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1972 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty should accelerate faster than 1972 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 370 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 1972 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty. 1972 NSU Ro 80 has automatic transmission and 2002 Honda Acty has manual transmission. 2002 Honda Acty will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 NSU Ro 80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Honda Acty | 1972 NSU Ro 80 | |
| Make | Honda | NSU |
| Model | Acty | Ro 80 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 2390 cc |
| Horse Power | 127 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1210 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 37 L |
