2002 Honda Acty vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Acty (127 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Mazda RX-2 weights approximately 120 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 1973 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Honda Acty | 1973 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | Acty | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 960 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2480 mm |