2002 Honda Acty vs. 1976 Toyota Crown

To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,987 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Acty (127 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1976 Toyota Crown. (102 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty should accelerate faster than 1976 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Toyota Crown weights approximately 510 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty.

Because 1976 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Toyota Crown (157 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 1976 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty. 1976 Toyota Crown has automatic transmission and 2002 Honda Acty has manual transmission. 2002 Honda Acty will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Toyota Crown will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: