2002 Honda Acty vs. 1979 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Pontiac Trans Am would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am (220 HP) has 93 more horse power than 2002 Honda Acty. (127 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Acty.
Because 1979 Pontiac Trans Am is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am (434 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 1979 Pontiac Trans Am will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Honda Acty | 1979 Pontiac Trans Am | |
Make | Honda | Pontiac |
Model | Acty | Trans Am |
Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 6555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 434 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2750 mm |