2002 Honda Acty vs. 1983 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,439 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Acty (127 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1983 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty should accelerate faster than 1983 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 84 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda Acty (139 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mitsubishi Colt. (102 Nm). This means 2002 Honda Acty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Honda Acty | 1983 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Honda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Acty | Colt |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 1439 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 127 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 924 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2390 mm |
