2002 Honda Acty vs. 1986 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Acty (127 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1986 Toyota Celica. (115 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty should accelerate faster than 1986 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Toyota Celica weights approximately 330 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty.
Because 1986 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Toyota Celica (172 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 1986 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Honda Acty | 1986 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Honda | Toyota |
Model | Acty | Celica |
Year Released | 2002 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 172 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1170 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2620 mm |