2002 Honda Acty vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Honda Acty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Honda Acty would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2002 Honda Acty. (127 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Acty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 645 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (215 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Honda Acty | 2003 MG ZT | |
Make | Honda | MG |
Model | Acty | ZT |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 215 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1485 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2760 mm |