2002 Honda City vs. 2013 Lotus Evora

To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Honda City. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Honda City would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (345 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 2002 Honda City. (94 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda City. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lotus Evora weights approximately 498 kg more than 2002 Honda City. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda City, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (400 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda City. (121 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda City.

Compare all specifications: