2002 Honda Civic vs. 1956 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2002 Honda Civic is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Civic (157 HP) has 117 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda Civic weights approximately 54 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Honda Civic | 1956 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Honda | Toyota |
| Model | Civic | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 157 HP | 40 HP |
| Vehicle Weight | 1264 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2540 mm |
