2002 Honda Integra vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Honda Integra would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (252 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2002 Honda Integra. (217 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 2002 Honda Integra has manual transmission. 2002 Honda Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Honda Integra | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Honda | Cadillac |
Model | Integra | BLS |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 252 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4374 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1725 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1394 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 58 L |