2002 Honda Life vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 2002 Honda Life is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Riley RM A weights approximately 375 kg more than 2002 Honda Life.
Because 1953 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Life, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Honda Life has automatic transmission and 1953 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1953 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Honda Life will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Honda Life | 1953 Riley RM A | |
Make | Honda | Riley |
Model | Life | RM A |
Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 656 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2870 mm |