2002 Honda Logo vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 2002 Honda Logo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Proton 400 (67 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2002 Honda Logo. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Logo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 400 weights approximately 195 kg more than 2002 Honda Logo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Proton 400 (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Logo. (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Proton 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Logo.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Honda Logo | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Honda | Proton |
Model | Logo | 400 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1343 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 108 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2510 mm |