2002 Honda S-MX vs. 1997 Mercury MC4
To start off, 2002 Honda S-MX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury MC4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury MC4 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Mercury MC4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercury MC4 (202 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2002 Honda S-MX. (129 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercury MC4 should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda S-MX.
Because 2002 Honda S-MX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mercury MC4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda S-MX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mercury MC4 (387 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda S-MX. (190 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1997 Mercury MC4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda S-MX. 1997 Mercury MC4 has automatic transmission and 2002 Honda S-MX has manual transmission. 2002 Honda S-MX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Mercury MC4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Honda S-MX | 1997 Mercury MC4 | |
Make | Honda | Mercury |
Model | S-MX | MC4 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1973 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 387 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |