2002 Honda S-MX vs. 1998 Panoz Q9
To start off, 2002 Honda S-MX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Panoz Q9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Panoz Q9 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Honda S-MX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Panoz Q9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda S-MX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 488 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda S-MX. (190 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda S-MX. 1998 Panoz Q9 has automatic transmission and 2002 Honda S-MX has manual transmission. 2002 Honda S-MX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Panoz Q9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Honda S-MX | 1998 Panoz Q9 | |
Make | Honda | Panoz |
Model | S-MX | Q9 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1973 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 678 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2650 mm |