2002 Honda Saber vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Honda Saber is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,649 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Honda Saber is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Saber (201 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Saber should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda Saber weights approximately 320 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda Saber (240 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Honda Saber will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Honda Saber | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Honda | Triumph |
| Model | Saber | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2649 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 64 L |
