2002 Honda Saber vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Honda Saber. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Honda Saber would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda Saber weights approximately 650 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Saber, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda Saber (240 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Honda Saber will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Honda Saber | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Honda | Smart |
Model | Saber | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 81 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 33 L |