2002 Honda Step Wagon vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Honda Step Wagon is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 770 kg more than 2002 Honda Step Wagon.
Because 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Step Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Honda Step Wagon | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Honda | Oldsmobile |
Model | Step Wagon | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 5736 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1610 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2960 mm |