2002 Honda Step Wagon vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2002 Honda Step Wagon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Honda Step Wagon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2002 Honda Step Wagon. (67 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Step Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 505 kg more than 2002 Honda Step Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Step Wagon. (119 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Step Wagon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Honda Step Wagon | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Honda | Mazda |
| Model | Step Wagon | CU-X |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 119 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 80 L |
