2002 Honda Step Wagon vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox

To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Honda Step Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Honda Step Wagon would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2002 Honda Step Wagon. (67 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Step Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 873 kg more than 2002 Honda Step Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Step Wagon. (119 Nm). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Step Wagon.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Honda Step Wagon 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
Make Honda Chevrolet
Model Step Wagon Equinox
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Minivan Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 67 HP 180 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 6700 RPM
Torque 119 Nm 233 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 8 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 840 kg 1713 kg
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2857 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 42 L 71 L