2002 Honda Stream vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Honda Stream. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Honda Stream would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 158 more horse power than 2002 Honda Stream. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Stream.
Because 2012 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Stream, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Stream. (150 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Stream.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Honda Stream | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Honda | Holden |
| Model | Stream | UTE |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1668 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 281 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
