2002 Honda Z vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2002 Honda Z is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2002 Honda Z. (51 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 180 kg more than 2002 Honda Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Honda Z is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Z will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Honda Z | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Honda | Sunbeam |
| Model | Z | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 656 cc | 4259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 27 L |
