2002 Honda Z vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2002 Honda Z is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2002 Honda Z. (51 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda Z weights approximately 20 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Z. (60 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Honda Z | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Honda | Mazda |
| Model | Z | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 656 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 57 L |
