2002 Honda Z vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Honda Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Honda Z would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (222 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 2002 Honda Z. (51 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 519 kg more than 2002 Honda Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Honda Z is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ford E-Series. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Z will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (387 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Z. (60 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Honda Z | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
| Make | Honda | Ford |
| Model | Z | E-Series |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 656 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 222 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 387 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 64 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.38:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 25 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1479 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 2085 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3505 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 150 L |
