2002 Hummer H2 vs. 1970 Triumph 1300
To start off, 2002 Hummer H2 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Hummer H2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Hummer H2 (316 HP) has 256 more horse power than 1970 Triumph 1300. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Hummer H2 should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Hummer H2 weights approximately 1988 kg more than 1970 Triumph 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Hummer H2 (522 Nm) has 423 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm). This means 2002 Hummer H2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Hummer H2 | 1970 Triumph 1300 | |
| Make | Hummer | Triumph |
| Model | H2 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1970 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5964 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 316 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 99 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2903 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2070 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2020 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2460 mm |
