2002 Hummer H2 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Hummer H2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Hummer H2 would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Hummer H2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2002 Hummer H2. (316 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2002 Hummer H2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Hummer H2 weights approximately 1032 kg more than 2013 Jaguar XJ.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Hummer H2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Hummer H2 (522 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jaguar XJ. (450 Nm). This means 2002 Hummer H2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Hummer H2 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Hummer | Jaguar |
| Model | H2 | XJ |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5964 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 316 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 2903 kg | 1871 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5127 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2070 mm | 2105 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2020 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3032 mm |
