2002 Hyundai Elantra vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2002 Hyundai Elantra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Hyundai Elantra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Hyundai Elantra (137 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Hyundai Elantra should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Hyundai Elantra weights approximately 285 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Hyundai Elantra (183 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm). This means 2002 Hyundai Elantra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Hyundai Elantra | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Hyundai | Riley |
| Model | Elantra | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2380 mm |
