2002 Hyundai Getz vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2002 Hyundai Getz is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Hyundai Getz (135 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Hyundai Getz should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Hyundai Getz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Hyundai Getz | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Hyundai | Lotus |
Model | Getz | Elan |
Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2240 mm |