2002 Hyundai Getz vs. 2012 Honda Civic
To start off, 2012 Honda Civic is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Hyundai Getz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Hyundai Getz would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda Civic (110 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2002 Hyundai Getz. (61 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 2002 Hyundai Getz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Honda Civic weights approximately 189 kg more than 2002 Hyundai Getz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda Civic (172 Nm @ 1000 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Hyundai Getz. (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Hyundai Getz.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Hyundai Getz | 2012 Honda Civic | |
Make | Hyundai | Honda |
Model | Getz | Civic |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1086 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 61 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1294 kg |
Fuel Consumption | 5 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.2 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |