2002 Hyundai Getz vs. 2013 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2013 Ford Taurus is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Hyundai Getz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Hyundai Getz would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Taurus (284 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 2002 Hyundai Getz. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2002 Hyundai Getz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Taurus weights approximately 797 kg more than 2002 Hyundai Getz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford Taurus is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Hyundai Getz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Taurus (344 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Hyundai Getz. (144 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Hyundai Getz. 2013 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 2002 Hyundai Getz has manual transmission. 2002 Hyundai Getz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Hyundai Getz | 2013 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Hyundai | Ford |
| Model | Getz | Taurus |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1606 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 344 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1907 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 5154 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2177 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2868 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.4 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.3 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 72 L |
