2002 Hyundai Matrix vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 2002 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Hyundai Matrix (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Hyundai Matrix should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 210 kg more than 1965 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 144 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Hyundai Matrix | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Hyundai | Volvo |
| Model | Matrix | 220 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1604 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 45 L |
